View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0005718 | CaseTalk Modeler | Import and Export | public | 2026-07-01 12:03 | 2026-07-27 17:47 |
| Reporter | Marco Wobben | Assigned To | |||
| Priority | normal | Severity | feature | Reproducibility | have not tried |
| Status | new | Resolution | open | ||
| Target Version | 15.x | ||||
| Summary | 0005718: Support the full set of ArchiMate relationship types in the ArchiMate export | ||||
| Description | The ArchiMate export (PlantUML picture and XMI) currently renders these relationships, derived automatically where the model implies them: composition and aggregation (from a relationship's type or a container grouping its members), specialization (subtype), realization (concept to object type) and association (the default). Extend it to support the remaining ArchiMate relationship types so exported diagrams can express the full notation:
This requires a way to assign an ArchiMate relationship type to a relationship between concepts/containers, and the ability to set that type through the MCP interface (which today can set an element's ArchiMate type but not a relationship's). | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| CaseTalk Edition | Corporate | ||||
| related to | 0005719 | new | Allow multiple concept types on one object/fact type (e.g. ELM and ArchiMate at once) |
|
A matrix can be assembled between partof/playedby types to determine the most likely archimate relationship type, but roles may still need some concepttype similar to the OTFT does. |
|
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-01 12:03 | Marco Wobben | New Issue | |
| 2026-07-01 12:10 | Marco Wobben | Relationship added | related to 0005719 |
| 2026-07-27 17:47 | Marco Wobben | Note Added: 0008660 |